CONFRONTATION IN BOLIVIA IS “NARCOTICS’ TRAFFICKING AGAINST DEMOCRACY”
The Bolivian nation’s civil resistance movement has triumphed by removing Evo Morales, the dictator. The international community and institutions were wrong in their assessment of Bolivia’s objective reality. The establishment of Morales’ dictatorship in Bolivia was the outcome of a transnational intervention’s process, but the Bolivian people’s struggle to recover their democracy has been and is totally domestic. Within the context of Castrochavist narco-states”, the state of Bolivia, controlled by Evo Morales, is the main producer and supplier of coca/cocaine. By losing this unencumbered, unrestricted production and drug delivery area, Cuba and Venezuela’s dictatorships are losing the most important part of the cocaine business, a part in which Mexico is an essential participant of with its Cartels. This is why the terrorism to produce bloody massacres that Evo Morales is promoting from Mexico are not a matter of policy, they are nothing less than the confrontation of narcotics’ trafficking -disguised as popular demonstrations- against democracy. Is to try to avoid Bolivia, following the removal of its dictatorial regime, take away narcotics trafficking’s power -disguised as politics- and restore the War on Drugs and Money Laundering, restore DEA’s cooperation, start an investigation of amassed fortunes, abide by laws and treaties against narcotics’ trafficking. It is certainly narcotics’ trafficking against democracy.