REALIGN LATIN AMERICAN GOVERNMENTS’ FOREIGN POLICY WITH CUBA’S DICTATORSHIP
The greatest threat to democracies’ stability in the Americas is Cuba’s dictatorship with its control over Venezuela and Nicaragua’s dictatorships, its pretension to regain its regimes in Ecuador and Bolivia, and its strategy of constant sedition with crime as the means to do it. Foreign policy “is that part of the general policy comprised by the set of decisions and doings through which a State’s objectives are defined and means are used to generate, modify, or suspend its relations with other actors from the international community”. the region’s factual reality shows that in this 21st century, there are two Americas divided by the nature of their governments and systems: The democratic one and the organized crime’s dictatorial other. One that is legitimate and the other that is de-facto. The first with the rule of law, and the second with shameful regimes. The democratic one with freedoms and the dictatorial other with political prisoners and exiles. Organized crime’s dictatorships, under the direction of Cuba, have disguised their criminal undertaking as politics with the worn-out propaganda of the Cuban revolution, to the point that failure can no longer be hidden and its role as producers and exporters of misery and crime is shameful. This summary of criminal acts that in this 21st century was perpetrated by Castrochavism, is only the reoccurrence of similar crimes committed by Cuba’s dictatorship since the decade of the sixties, a time in which it blood-stained the region with guerrillas, terrorism, narcotics’ trafficking. It is only more of the same and is from Cuba’s 61-year dictatorship. The questions are: Why do democratic governments still do not openly see Cuba’s dictatorship as an “aggressor state”, as an “enemy regime”, or as “an organized crime system”? Why do democracies insist in embracing foreign policies of simulation and defenselessness when facing dictatorial aggression? Why do they continue relating and trading with Cuba instead of adjusting their foreign policies for the protection of their own stability?