The considerations regarding Brazil lead Jair Bolsonaro not to act as President, but as its owner. The “giant of South America” is, then, its large estate of 8.5 km2 and 213,993,441 people. It could even be argued that the Prime Minister sits Pedro I and IV of Portugal, but correcting the mistakes of the latter.
The country did not escape from “the National Constituent Assembly”, a custom rooted in Latin America, as a methodology to conform as “a State destined to ensure the exercise of freedom, security, well-being, development, equality and justice as values of a fraternal, pluralistic and non-judgmental society, founded on social harmony and committed to internal and international order, to the peaceful resolution of disputes and under the protection of God. The formula led, as in all of South America, to the promulgation of a Constitution aimed at conforming to the Republic. Of her, as known, Pedro I was emperor.
The constituent process takes place after more than two decades of the prevailing “wave of dictatorships”. Tancredo Neves, the first civil president elected through the particular methodology of the “indirect vote”, promised it, but before his death it fell to Jose Sarney to install “the Assembly”. This is how, in September 1988, Brazil became governed by the “Law of Laws”. Jurists have described the Text as a “governing constitution”, due to the programmatic norms that it enshrines, among them, those that define the primary objectives of the Republic. He is criticized for having postulated “a bureaucratic superstate” by reproducing “state capitalism”, when “globalization” was the scenario. Today, the latter, however, questioned.
The “owner” is censured to represent “the global right”, apparently more “troglodyte” than “the less” ambitious, called “altersystem or alterworldism.” In “the media” reference is made to “An assault on democracy in slow motion”, based on the expressions of “Great Jair”, among others, “I will deliver the presidential sash to the one who wins me cleanly at the polls”, understood as a claim to the manual vote, despite having been elected electronically. In “The People Against Democracy”, Yascha Mount refers to governments that destroy democracy from within”. The “ex-captain Jair”, as it is stated, applies “militarism” to remain in power, like “chavismo” in Venezuela. Because of this there is talk of “an olive green democracy”.
The methodology consists of “taking power to hold onto the government through a thousand-headed monster”, taking advantage of the fact that more efficient formulas are sought to govern than “paper democracies”. Atypical regimes have been generated, such as those of Argentina, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Bolivia and Peru. Today we are fighting against the terrible disaster that they have generated.
It is clear that the risk of democracy in Brazil is not a speculation, much less an invention of those who oppose “The Great Jair”, including those who support Lula de Silva, who by the way in one of the polls exceeds to the current chief magistrate with 49 points to 23 and in another 58 to 31. One of the most conclusive proofs of the fear founded in the largest country in South America, is that “almost a million Brazilians have signed a manifesto against” the authoritarian drift of Bolsonaro”. The media notes that the letter was read at the Faculty of Law of the University of São Paulo and that it recalls a similar letter issued in 1977 against the ruling dictatorship at the time. “The Great Jair”, then, has, without a doubt, a marked vocation to the “necessary gendarme”.
“Míster Jair” acts, consequently, as Luis XIV “L ´État, c´est moi”. But as “Leviathan”, despite military, religiously as “evangelical” and having read from “Isaiah”: “On that day the LORD will punish with his fierce sword, great and powerful, Leviathan, elusive serpent, Leviathan, devious serpent , and kill the dragon that lives in the sea. Nor has his beautiful wife explained it to him, nor to his followers, in the role he has assigned to her of rallying evangelical doctrine as an exalted pastor, not to cheer the soul, but to attract voters, given the high percentage of Brazilians who have added to the aforementioned religion. They have done so convinced that “the worship of the true God is an authentic natural instinct that responds to the sense of transcendence that we as human beings have”. “The Clever Jair” uses the cultivation of the spirit for proselytizing purposes. He does not know the ex-captain, for sure, to Thomas Hobbes about the social contract and the creation of an ideal State”.
It is not daring to affirm, furthermore, that he has not looked at Hobbes with respect to a real or hypothetical pact between the governed and their governors that defines the rights and duties of each one. For Bolsonaro, it seems that the State is the one he abuses as “owner of Brazil”, convinced that primitive times continue where individuals were born in an anarchic state of nature. “The giant of the south” has half exercised natural reason, corresponding to “Jair” to institute it as a society with a government in between. But like the one currently presiding.
Brazil, considered by some to be “the happiest country in the World”, is added to the Latin American uncertainty.
God willing, therefore, that the Brazilians vote well in their already close elections and that the result continues to keep them in the joy of the samba.
“The opinions published here are the sole responsibility of their author.”
