“Bloomberg places judgment and knowledge over partisan loyalty and law abiding over exploitation of loopholes — a nice outcome to a fractious and rancorous political battle that will be the fight for the presidency next year. But this might be a fluke,” “But wasn’t President Trump’s election also a fluke?”
Now it is Colombia’s turn. It happened before in Mexico and Chile. Vandals have destroyed a great part of Santiago de Chile. Indirectly, vandals harm the whole society. The damages inflicted on the public sector mean less services than those already budgeted. Fewer school cafeterias. Less health and education. Less resources for retirees. Less parks and recreation. Less investment. Fewer jobs. Less growth. There is not a single positive aspect in vandalism. How can we deal with these destructive citizens? In my opinion, with severity and fairness. Maybe modifying the penal codes. The society, represented by the State, must do so. How? Perhaps taking the guilty ones before severe courts. If they are minors, making the families pay the expenses of the destruction carried out by these rascals. It is very important that these reforms of sentences and punishments be carried out. Then comes the time to cry, but the origin is in the vandals and in the passivity of the governments that tolerate them.
The Bolivian nation’s civil resistance movement has triumphed by removing Evo Morales, the dictator. The international community and institutions were wrong in their assessment of Bolivia’s objective reality. The establishment of Morales’ dictatorship in Bolivia was the outcome of a transnational intervention’s process, but the Bolivian people’s struggle to recover their democracy has been and is totally domestic. Within the context of Castrochavist narco-states”, the state of Bolivia, controlled by Evo Morales, is the main producer and supplier of coca/cocaine. By losing this unencumbered, unrestricted production and drug delivery area, Cuba and Venezuela’s dictatorships are losing the most important part of the cocaine business, a part in which Mexico is an essential participant of with its Cartels. This is why the terrorism to produce bloody massacres that Evo Morales is promoting from Mexico are not a matter of policy, they are nothing less than the confrontation of narcotics’ trafficking -disguised as popular demonstrations- against democracy. Is to try to avoid Bolivia, following the removal of its dictatorial regime, take away narcotics trafficking’s power -disguised as politics- and restore the War on Drugs and Money Laundering, restore DEA’s cooperation, start an investigation of amassed fortunes, abide by laws and treaties against narcotics’ trafficking. It is certainly narcotics’ trafficking against democracy.
Once upon a time Chairman Mao revealed to Roger Peyrefitte his secret for success by cryptically indicating ‘I know my people because I pause to hear the grass grow'” This is looking at what is happening in Hong Kong, Chile, Bolivia and Venezuela. “In our hemisphere political leadership seems to have entered a hypnotic state that prevents them from even seeing the grass.”
The flagrant electoral fraud and crimes committed by Evo Morales and his regime catalyzed the “Bolivian nation” that had endured for more than a decade. In the wake of almost three weeks of civil resistance, Evo Morales is now a dictator who has been defeated by the Bolivian nation and is solely sustained by the Castrochavist intervention. The concept and existence of the Bolivian nation, a mongrel or mestizo nation, diverse yet unique, is built upon and is sustained through “an alliance of classes” and not through a fight between classes. Through the Castrochavist inspired constitution “the fight between races” is introduced through the acknowledgement of the existence of 36 nations in Bolivia’s territory and with the elimination of the Republic and the establishment of a plurinational state. This has got to be the greatest crime committed by Evo Morales to destroy the “Bolivian nation” and cannot be taken as anything but treason to the homeland when he delivered Bolivia to foreign intervention and Transnational Organized Crime that, at that time, was presented as the Bolivarian Movement, or 21st Century Socialism, but that now is known as Castrochavism. Because there exists a Bolivian nation, the confrontation in Bolivia is between the regime and Bolivia’s people, it is between Evo Morales and Bolivians, between the Castrochavist transnational intervention and the defense of the homeland. This is also why the request for the dictator’s resignation is national. Only Castrochavism’s violent and criminal intervention sustains Evo Morales. Bottom line; the dictator is defeated, the enemy identified, and the Bolivian nation is unified and mobilized.
The rapid pace of change in Bolivia and Argentina on the 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin wall. The Wall that was the symbol of oppression and denial of progress was brought down without firing a single bullet. Chile is a world apart from the rest of the continent as its government dealt with the most destructive and gang penetrated mobs with democratic means. Up to the last two weeks Bolivia’s government indulged in two mortal mistakes. First, the order to initiate the land clearing in the Amazonian rain forest triggered the worst fire to have been endured by the Amazonian. Second, under the inquisitive eye of smart phones an electoral fraud was perpetrated. Mr Morales executed the fraud plans so that there would not be any runoff. Today, he is presiding over a paralyzed country. Sunday, he resigned. In the end, the beginning of the fall of the totalitarian wall could be ongoing in Bolivia. In Argentina yet another wall is about to collapse. Mr Fernandez is attempting to revive the axis of evil. Argentina will thus represent yet another hole in the wall of tyranny.
On November 9, 1989, the demolition of the Berlin Wall began, together with the disappearance of communism in Europe. Thirty years have passed since that extraordinary episode. Freedom was that––to be able to fight for a better destiny without a State deciding for us, without a Party making our choices, without the eyes of the political police permanently perched on our necks. If Gorbachev had resorted to violence, communism would have continued to rule in the USSR and in Eastern Europe. Gorbachev was not a bloodthirsty man. He was communist and patriot, but not murderer. Gorbachev wanted to transform Russia into a truly developed, prosperous and free nation, but without private ownership of the means of production, governed by a planned system, in accordance with the Marxist collectivist project. “Why did Gorbachev fail?”. “Because communism does not adapt to human nature.” Thirty years after its disappearance in Europe, collectivism, intertwined with drug trafficking, is making a comeback and shows its hairy ear in some Latin American countries. It is no longer about creating paradise on earth, but hell. It will not prevail. Nor does it adapt to human nature.
As the United States withdraws from the world and international affairs, China and Russia step in, to the detriment of U.S. interests. The United States is now applying strong sanctions on Venezuela in an effort to bring the Venezuelan regime down. However, China and Russia (particularly Russia) have a major interest in keeping the Maduro regime alive. As part of a U.S. sanctions policy towards Venezuela, there are several U.S. companies whose license to operate in Venezuela has been temporarily extended until January. If these companies lose their licenses, it is expected that Chinese and Russian oil producers and their more than 600 service companies would take over American operations and assets. The U.S. must do everything in its power to remove Maduro and install a new temporary government led by Juan Guaido. Once a new government takes over, American companies can operate normally, and the Russians and Chinese can effectively be displaced.
The threats to the promising future of Latin America from crime in Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua and Colombia. Today the world gravitation point is slowly displacing itself to Asia while in the Americas interdependence has weaved together all the economies and is moving slowly but surely to the establishment of an integrated economic space. Latin nations and the US could be the losing party in a chess game were Crime Inc will execute a clean checkmate in seven movements. And once this happens smaller gangs in the region will get emboldened.
The electoral fraud perpetrated in Bolivia for Evo Morales is comprised by a long series of wrongdoings in preparation for the crime committed on elections’ day. The absence of the rule of law, the total control of all branches of government, the manipulation of identification in voter’s registration, the enabling of Morales as a candidate, the fabricated primary elections, the falsifications and manipulation of electoral results, are some of the elements of the fraud. Due to the flagrancy of the crime and by its condition of being a “noteworthy fact”, the OAS’ observers and the observers of those countries who participated in the elections of the 20th of October, immediately recommended a second round of voting as a diplomatic way of saying what everyone in Bolivia and the media were already and very clearly saying: FRAUD!. The national indignation have all produced the request to consider these as NULL ELECTIONS, and to request Evo Morales’ departure from the government with the slogan “OUT EVO”. General Secretary Almagro has agreed with the regime to conduct a binding electoral audit. This is to say that he has involved the OAS with the fraud and the illegal and violent sustainment of Evo Morales. Could it be, perchance, that Almagro and the OAS ignore the flagrancy of the electoral fraud and related crimes? Does Almagro and the OAS know the legal concept of “noteworthy facts”? Why does he shy away from the initial report by his own electoral observers?
The Interamerican Institute for Democracy is a non-profit organization under regulation 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Contributions may qualify as donations from corporate entities. Contributions – tax free as permitted by law – are received from individuals, foundations, corporations, and limited partnerships.
