Vladimir Putin usually receives the most important figures, including heads of state, at a “table” longer than the word “Vladimirovich, his middle name. He does it in “The Kremlin”, in the heart of Moscow, built by the “Rurik Dynasty, in principle, the founders of Russia.
The current president was an intelligence officer in the KGB, where, as it is written, they harshly punished the regime’s protesters. A simile of Hitler’s Gestapo. He served as prime minister with Boris Yeltsin, who questions the exercise of power by the Communist Party and proposes that the economy be governed by the market. He renounces the second electoral victory, which he obtained despite having distanced himself from Michael Gorbachev, a genius who described that the USSR had succumbed, for which it was forced to advance different policies. “The man with vodka” handed over the State and the Armed Forces to the one with “the long table”. “Don Boris” will be repentant, since the substitute is convinced of the benefits of the absolute exercise of power, in order to avoid its politicization and negative consequences,
The leadership of the peoples, we should emphasize, that as the journeys reveal, both in the old USSR and in Russia, the last look as a formally updated republic, is still an embarrassing mission that requires sanity and a mind without mental illness. The incidences of “reason-without reason” outlined by Michael Foucault in “History of Madness” are incompatible with the function of government. On the contrary, what is needed is the ability to think and act with good judgment, prudence, reflection, good sense and responsibility. Will Putin have those qualities? It is still a legitimate question, not only with respect to him, but, numerically speaking, to a few leaders, an important cause, among others, for “the world”, as more than one affirms, to be “a zaperoco” .
It is often read, in effect, that one of the most important factors of the presidents is their personality, first, even, that the political party that postulates it and even of the government plan. Capital importance is attached to the “trust” they convey, as it tries to reveal with the hypothesis that if you, in an emergency to be absent, would dare to leave your minor child with one of the candidates so that he or she is well cared for. The question mark in the case of Russia would therefore go through trust in the successor of Gorbachev and Yeltsin. Of course, less would have in “Vladimir” those of those territories that fight fratricidally for annexation. He will be, perhaps, the man of “the long tabola”, “eartheater”, as well as rudely distant. A reading of “The Classification of Psychiatric Disorders” by Professor Michael Rutter, read your subjects. The sources describe him as a “communist dictator” for having “misruled” from 2000 to today. His party “United Russia” accompanies him. And a few fellow citizens, too, however, what is revealed by “The Democracy Index”, in whose pages he is described as an autocrat and with other epithets.
It is also written in relation to the “democratic retrogression” under “Vladimir Vladimirovich”, with the consequent turn to absolutism. Additionally, about entrenched corruption, confinement, repression and the absence of free and fair elections. He sounds, then, like a “hecatomb” what he has done with Russia. The last implosion of the atypical personality of the Russian Chief, who was born in St. Petersburg, astrologically endowed with power and emotional energy, like scorpions, so today, given the defeat he has received in the invaded Ukraine, he must feel deeply humiliated , reason for the journalist Lluís Bassets to outline him as Hitler in Gernika or Mussolini in Barcelona, during the Spanish civil war. In his last appearance in “the media” the Russian dictator could not contain his anger and hatred. More than one thought that “the nuclear assault” is close. God grant that the percussor is not where he places his hands on his atypical “long table”.
The world cannot deny that it continues with contradictions and that in Russia they are enormous. Indeed, when reading its Constitution, it is difficult for us to consider it different from that of democratic countries, since it enshrines political and ethical values, social peace and harmony, state unity, equality, self-determination of peoples, love and respect for the Homeland, faith in justice and well-being and prosperity. Likewise, it typifies a State governed by democracy, sovereignty, the rule of law and the separation of powers. It registers the inalienable nature of fundamental human and civil rights, freedoms and equality. It delineates the federal structure and the competition between the Federation and the constituent entities. But, also, to the President as Head of State, the Federal Assembly is the Parliament, the Government, executive body and the autonomy of judges. The Chief Justice in a special place for the sake of the interaction of government bodies. In the real context, therefore, it is difficult not to highlight “the separation between what is written and reality”, but with the seriousness that this does not happen only in Russia. A truth that unfortunately is found throughout the world.
The logical conclusion is, then, that Russia is at the mercy of “a long table”, a sign of “Putin’s long dictatorship”. And this leads to qualify the rulers:
“Sane, a few, crazy, a few more.” And “criminals” abound.
“The opinions published here are the sole responsibility of their author.”
