The Catholic Church of Pope Francis is well characterized by the gift that the Bolivian satrap Evo Morales gave him back in 2015 of a crucifix set with a hammer and sickle, on the occasion of a papal visit to Bolivia, a gift that the Supreme Pontiff accepted with a complicit smile on his lips, expressing “I understand this work, for me it is not an offense”. The political harmony was thus more than evident, the friendship that unites them even today. It is the same ideological harmony that unites him with the satraps of our continent, be they Raúl Castro, Nicolás Maduro, the evil Ortega-Murillo duo, Cristina Kirchner, Lula da Silva, Gustavo Petro. . . and some unpresentable more of our political environment. He has received most of them at the Vatican, thus demonstrating his solidarity and support. His latest feat in this regard was receiving a few months ago the then candidate for the Colombian presidency Gustavo Petro, alias Comandante Aureliano, in charge of the town’s gloomy prisons where they held kidnapped civilians and then exchanged them for large sums of money. Bergoglio practically gave him his endorsement, his blessing, motivating the hypocritical Petro to start visiting churches, kneel down, take photos, facts that would become votes. He has also received the corrupt Lula, as soon as he was released from prison, showing his sympathy and support for him. And let’s not talk about her incomprehensible and fatal friendship with the evil Cristina Kirchner, which he often received at the Vatican, always pronouncing his fateful phrase “Take care of Cristina.” With this perfidious support that continues to this day, he is co-responsible for the political, social, moral and economic chaos that Argentina is going through. And let’s not overlook the continent’s oldest, bloodiest dictator Raúl Castro for whom he feels, in his own words, “enormous sympathy.”
The prestigious Argentine writer and journalist Jorge Fernández Diaz is quite right in stating that “Bergoglio never dreamed of being Pope, he dreamed of being Perón” and that “he will have papal infallibility, but not in politics. He gets into it a lot and does a lot of damage.” Yes, it is very true, he was born to be a leftist political manipulator, but not to be the maximum leader of the world Catholic Church. Bergoglio is not even a Peronist, he is a communist and he shows it in his homilies, speeches and interviews when he dares to talk about economics. Another of his compatriots, the young, controversial libertarian economist Javier Milei, who has the support of the youth above all, also has very harsh words with the pontiff by plainly stating that his economic model simply means the poverty of the people. “Donkey, ignorant in economic matters, a cultist of the model based on hatred, envy, resentment, enemy of the middle class”. The Argentine libertarian leader goes so far as to say that he is “the representative of the evil one in the House of God”.
Bergoglio is cowardly silent in the face of the outrages, persecutions suffered by his church that tries to defend the most basic human rights in our continent. He also blatantly lies when the international press asks him for his opinion about the dramatic situation in his country of origin, claiming not to be informed. Yes, he is, and largely, through corrupt journalists at the service of the Kirchnerist mafia who are among his friends. This is the case of the journalist Gustavo Sylvestre, who a few months ago released a letter in the handwriting of the Pope in which Bergoglio condemns the brave independent Argentine press, besieged, frightened, intimidated, calling it scum, garbage and accusing it of “ coprophilia“, term used in psychology and that defines the pleasure experienced when manipulating, touch or smell the droppings. Something unusual, improper in the mouth of a supreme pontiff. Also in this letter, which he heads with the phrase “Dear Cat”, the journalist’s nickname, he elaborates congratulating him for “cleaning up” the information on his country.
The entire priestly career of Bergoglio forms a rosary of betrayals, hypocrisies and concealment of unusual facts and at odds with a true man of faith. Several Vaticanists have come to affirm that even the appointment of the Pope is not legitimate because it is the product of mafia deals by progressive groups within the Curia, the so-called Club de San Gallen, which met periodically in this Swiss city. This scandal has been investigated and published in two books by independent Vaticanists. Let us only cite the book by the Italian Antonio Socci “Bergoglio non e Papa”, the investigation of the English Catherine Pepinster “The keys and the kingdom” and that of the American specialist George Neumayer “The political Pope”. In the book “Bergolio non e Papa”,
But let’s go back to our days and review the Machiavellian plans of Pope Francis for when he decides to withdraw from the throne of Saint Peter and his successor is chosen. And this may happen soon because the pontiff himself has mentioned it several times in recent months to his clique of progressive prelates and notorious leftist militancy who have managed to pave the way for the new anointed pope to be of the same political line as the current Pontiff. To implement his strategy, Bergoglio has appointed 83 of the 132 existing cardinals during his papacy. Of the 20 new cardinals appointed in Saint Peter’s Basilica last August, 16 are under 80 years old, therefore eligible to participate in the Conclave that would elect their successor, in case of their death, resignation or excommunication and removal. Among the newly appointed cardinals there are several who openly represent the extreme ecclesiastical left. A very decisive role in all these appointments is played by the German cardinal, very close to Pope Francis and from the extreme left, Reinhard Marx, known in the Vatican as the “Red Cardinal”, who ironically lives up to his surname. Marx is an international symbol for those within the Church who want to change it from the roots, ignoring its thousand-year-old Christian tradition, implanting a Church of the type of that of the Liberation Theology of the 1960s with its Marxist ideology and close to the satraps totalitarians that swarm today in our continent. A Bergoglian Church very akin to the socialist dictatorships of the 21st century.
There would be the remote possibility that all of Pope Francis’s misdeeds would lead the Catholic Church to seek his removal. In this case, Canon Law provides that when a Pope commits important infractions, the Encyclical Letter “Divini Redentoris” of March 19, 1937, which condemns communism for its “criminal perversity”, is applied. One could also resort to his removal from the “Decree of the Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office” of July 1, 1949, which explicitly prohibits favoring communism. But such a decision would require the help of the Holy Spirit or some miracle.
We are witnessing a sinister panorama that saddens us. The waters are cloudy from the Vatican for our democracies, and the great irony is that it is precisely a Latin American Pope who commits these excesses. How different was the papacy of the Polish Wojtyla, John Paul II, canonized in 2014, with his frontal fight against Stalinism in Eastern Europe, and his unwavering faith.
José Antonio Friedl Zapata
Political Scientist-Latin Americanist-Independent Journalist
Author of several books on Latin American themes
“The opinions published here are the sole responsibility of their author.”
