Russia strategically places in the arena that former President Chavez was poisoned…
Specifically, Igor Kirillov, commander of the Radiological, Chemical and Biological Defense of the Russian Armed Forces , stated that Hugo Chávez (1999-2013) was poisoned with a special substance capable of causing cancer. The Russian representative explained that the deadly liquid in question can cause cancer, as well as various chronic diseases. In addition, he said that it supposedly comes from the United States, which created this type of substance “in violation of international law.” He assured “that since 2002 Washington’s special services have been developing possible plans to eliminate the former Venezuelan leader.”
The death of Hugo Chávez was announced on March 5, 2013, although different personalities and publications They point out that he died before that date, in December 2012, where he would have been embalmed. The information that he obtained at the beginning of his illness was that Hugo Chávez suffered from a cancer called ‘Rhabdomyosarcoma of the Psoas system’ linked to the muscular area around the lumbar vertebrae. I understand that since May 2011, his first symptoms began, and on June 30, 2011, Chávez confirmed —from Havana— that he had undergone surgery to remove a tumor with cancerous cells. For that date, rhabdomyosarcoma was registered as a very aggressive cancer, and survival was estimated at 22 months of life, among the cases known to medicine. To date, more than 5 years of average life expectancy has been achieved in adult patients and much higher in children.
Additionally, the Russian military chief explains that the United States used Claudia Díaz to assassinate Hugo Chávez with carcinogenic drugs, but based on statements by officials from the government of Nicolás Maduro, and repeats that Nurse Díaz inoculated the Venezuelan president with cancer and that the United States extradited from Spain to prevent him from revealing the alleged conspiracy. “In particular, Kirillov made reference to the words of Nicolás Maduro, who on July 18 spoke publicly about the involvement of the United States in the assassination of Chávez,” Russia Today reported .
Claudia Patricia Díaz Guillén, is a 48-year-old retired military officer, is detained in a Florida prison , recently extradited from Spain, accused of receiving billionaire bribes thanks to the charges she held, for the crimes of “conspiracy to commit money laundering” and for “money laundering” Banking in Miami, Florida. Díaz Guillén was a trusted soldier of Hugo Chávez who was director of the National Treasury Office of Venezuela and secretary of the National Development Fund (FONDEN), an institution created by Chávez in 2005, to invest the millionaire resources that the country received for oil exports concept. Opposition leaders and independent organizations criticized the opaque management of FONDEN, even calling it “Chavez’s black box” for geopolitical purposes. It is considered that this fund managed up to 100,000 million dollars. In 2011 alone, he received up to 25% of oil royalties. Díaz Guillén is the wife of another Army officer, Adrián Velásquez.
Adrián José Velásquez Figueroa , like his wife Díaz Guillen, was approved for his extradition from Spain to the US, to be tried for the crime of money laundering in which he would have received “hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes” . His case is linked to the same judicial file in the US, and in addition to his wife, it includes Alejandro Andrade (alias El Tuerto), a military man, who was also aide-de-camp and treasurer of Hugo Chávez.
As we can see, it makes no sense that those who benefited from Hugo Chávez and were part of his most intimate circle had reasons to attack his ‘goose that lays the golden eggs’. Likewise, we have to assume that —now being in the hands of the United States justice system— there are reasons for some leaders of the Nicolás Maduro regime to discredit the nurse and aides and deputies of Chávez, for what they can reveal to the United States authorities about the intricacies of the shady handling of Venezuela’s resources by the governments of the regime initiated by Chavez.
However, as I pointed out in an interview for El Diario de Caracas, in 2013 , I repeat that I agree with the appointment of a commission to investigate whether President Hugo Chávez was assassinated, as requested by the —at that time— president in charge Nicolás Maduro . But Maduro may be in for a surprise because history shows us that the best way to find the assassins of the heads of state is to observe who benefited from their deaths…
I think that if the regime suspects that Chavez was assassinated, it is appropriate to find out. In the first place, because history shows us who the assassinations commit. For example, Emperor Claudius was poisoned and his wife Agrippina is blamed because she wanted her son Nero to ascend the imperial throne. To do this, he used the emperor’s food taster, Halotus, his physician Xenifon, and the “state” poisoner Locusta. All of Claudio’s absolute confidence. Also, Rodrigo de Borgia, already named Pope Alexander VI, died of poison and his son —who inherited him— César Borgia, was known as a murderer who used poisons to kill his victims.
I could also cite the supposed case of the poisoning of Napoleon who would have been intoxicated with arsenic by his assistant, Count Charles de Montholon, virtually Bonaparte’s most loyal servant. I am also referring to the case of Yasir Arafat, most likely poisoned with polonium 210, a radioactive material. Poison that would penetrate his body orally. The researchers suggest evidence of the polonium was found on his toothbrush. Which indicates that someone either put it in his toothpaste or in his food. Therefore, the complicity of a person close to Arafat is evident, who was governed by extreme security measures that included tasting his food before he ate it.
In relation to what Igor Kirillov, commander of the Radiological, Chemical and Biological Defense of Russia , indicates that Chavez was poisoned. I don’t know in particular if this could be the origin of a rhabdomyosarcoma, but in general the answer is yes, in that a cancer can be inoculated. In the experimental field, cancer is inoculated or implanted in animals to investigate procedures and treatments for its cure. But I have no knowledge that it is done in humans. Hypothetically, cancer cell lines, or an oncovirus, or chemical carcinogens can be injected to produce cancer. However, if it were done on a human, the victim would know, unless they were tricked into saying they were being injected for other reasons.
By the oral route, food can be contaminated with doses of radioactive material such as polonium, or other poisons can be applied in this way. Besides, we can talk about inhalation or receiving radiation doses in the area where the victim operates. However, the truth is that nothing of what has been said can be done without being detected by the security mechanisms of a contemporary president, and in particular the security service that Hugo Chávez had during his lifetime.
The first thing that should be done is to start investigating who has the capacity to produce a biological weapon of this magnitude, destined to kill or incapacitate a president.
Some countries have been singled out for this biotechnology, such as the United States, Russia, and China, but there are others, such as Iran, North Korea, or Cuba, that have been denounced as having the power and potential to develop weapons and biological agents.
As has been recently published , we have the case of the poisoning of Aleksei Navalni , a prominent Russian opposition figure, today a political prisoner for ‘crimes against the Russian state’, which was perpetrated on August 20, 2020, when, through a nerve agent, he was poisoned, remaining in a serious condition and miraculously saved by the rapid medical intervention and specialists. Other Russian politicians, journalists and opponents have suffered poisoning attacks, although the Kremlin denies any involvement in them.
In 2018, three people in England were injured and another died after exposure to ‘ Novichok’ (a group of nerve agents developed at the Soviet Union’s Gosniiokht state chemical research institute). The British prime minister said the attack was an assassination attempt “almost certainly approved… at a high level of the Russian state.”. Charges were authorized against three Russian intelligence officers who Russia has not extradited because they are Russian citizens. Also, former Russian spy and Putin critic Alexander Litvinenko was assassinated in London in 2006 after his tea was laced with polonium, a radioactive metal that, according to a UK public inquiry, was likely approved by Vladimir Putin himself. .
My recommendations would be the following: If Chavez was poisoned, it must have been by injection or orally. The only way to inject it is if your medical or dental team has misled you. The president’s security system includes different security circles and rings, which by the way are directed by Cuban intelligence, and made up mostly of Cuban agents. The health security circle and the team of professionals, in charge of the president’s health, must prevent the occurrence of an injection or any other medical act not decided by them. For fear of an attack, Hugo Chávez always entrusted his health to the doctors in Cuba. The president’s sleep waking circle prevents anyone from approaching him while he sleeps, and that the place where you spend the night is not contaminated by biohazardous or radioactive substances. The circle of security of the food and drink that the president ingests proceeds in the same way. So the first investigated must necessarily be those responsible for the safety and health of the president, basically of Cuban origin.
This is why I say that if the Maduro government opens a true investigation, it could be a surprise with the results, because if it were true that Chávez was assassinated, we all know who made up Hugo Chávez’s circles and security rings. , and to whom they reported, in addition to the president. If it were true, what would be his assassination would make it difficult for them to follow orders from the United States. One would necessarily have to point the other way. If the US governments have shown anything, it is that they act head-on. If they need to eliminate an enemy that puts their national security at risk, they have never hesitated to order his death without stopping to observe international law. In the United States, a president has the power to do so under the American legal framework. We have seen it recently in the case of Aymán Mohamed Rabie az Zawahiri , also known as Aymán al Zawahiri, who was an Egyptian surgeon and terrorist in command of the jihadist group Al Qaeda and killed by a drone attack. I also mention the case of the founder of Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden who was attacked and killed in his own home in Abbottabad, Pakistan, by the hands of elite US forces.
I want to point out that the Chavez poisoning theory is very confusing and problematic, because I imagine that the Castro brothers did not like the idea before, and now Miguel Diaz Canel and its situational room less so, because although they did not participate in giving the order in such an assassination, the presence of Cubans in President Chávez’s security team is notorious, and the full support and security support they provide to Nicolás Maduro, which in some way or another could point them out. If we add to this that all the supposed Cuban medical science could not save Chavez, the Castro dictatorship would remain in doubt before history for lying or at least omitting that Chavez was poisoned. It must also be taken into account and said that it was not the nurse or her husband, the aide-de-camp, who benefited from Chavez’s death, quite the contrary. They are subjected to US justice with a high probability of ending up in jail for a few years.
I personally believe that Hugo Chávez died as a result of rhabdomyosarcoma and its metastases.
If the regime established by Chávez considers that an investigative commission should be constituted, the only way that it will have credible results is for it to be made up of renowned forensic specialists from recognized national and international universities, where prejudiced ‘experts’ committed to some bias do not participate, because if the Russian or Cuban ‘experts’ do it, we already know what the results will be.
Finally, it is noteworthy that it is Russia and Venezuela who are currently bringing up the issue of the alleged poisoning of the former president. In the coming days we will surely see what is the strategy behind this information. ..
